Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases

Objective: To assess ethnic disparities in time to hospital presentation, use of acute reperfusion therapies, and in-hospital treatment times among patients presenting with stroke in a Dutch emergency department. Methods: In this single-centre observational cohort study, we included patients with a first-ever ischemic stroke between September 2020 and September 2021. Patients were categorized by ethnicity (with or without migration background). Demographic and stroke characteristics were compared between groups. Outcomes included: rates of presentation outside therapeutic time window, acute reperfusion therapy (intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular thrombectomy (EVT)), and, when applicable, door-to-treatment time (DTTT), with a door-to-needle time (DTNT) and door-to-groin time (DTGT) for IVT and EVT respectively. Univariable and multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses were performed, adjusted for age, sex, and NIHSS at presentation, where appropriate. Results: A total of 232 patients were included, of whom 62 (26.7%) had a migration background. These patients were younger (66.6 vs 71.2 years) and more frequently had diabetes (27.4% vs 15.9%). Sex distribution was similar (59.7% vs 60.6% male). Stroke etiology differed between groups with less cardio-embolism (4.8% vs 15.3%) and more small vessel disease (69.4% vs 48.2%) among patients with a migration background. These latter patients presented more often outside the therapeutic time window (53.2% vs 37.1%; OR 1.90; 95% CI 1.05-3.45). EVT was less frequently performed in patients with a migration background compared to those without (8.1% vs 22.4%; OR 0.28; 95% CI 0.10-0.75). There were no significant differences in treatment times (DTTT 38min vs 30min, DTNT 35min vs 26min, DTGT 64min vs 54min). Conclusion: Patients with a migration background were more likely to present outside the therapeutic time window and had a lower rate of EVT. In order to improve access for these patients, more insight into prehospital and within hospital barriers and facilitators for appropriate management are needed.

Sex specific differences in stroke are recognized. Whether differences in incident stroke risk persists in recent periods needs further elucidation to aid public health preventive efforts. Aim: To determine long-term sex specific trends in stroke and stroke risk factors at different epochs among Framingham Heart Study participants. Methods: We examined age-adjusted 10-year stroke incidence using Cox regression in women and men in five epochs: 1962-1969 (epoch 1, reference), 1971-1976 (epoch 2), 1987-1991 (epoch 3), 1998-2005 (epoch 4), 2015-2021 (epoch 5). We compared stroke incidence by sex across epochs, estimated decade-wise linear trends overall and by sex. We compared risk factors in successive epochs to the first, and estimated sex-specific trends in risk factors. Interactions between baseline risk factors with epoch and trends were assessed by sex. Secondary analyses were repeated in participants <60 years old. Results: Incident stroke occurred in 4.5% (178/3996) in epoch 1, 3.9% (227/5786) in epoch 2, 3.9% (199/5137) in epoch 3, 2.7% (207/7642) in epoch 4, 2.2% (119/5534) in epoch 5. Men had higher risk of incident stroke in each epoch with significant difference in epochs 2 (HR 1.41, 95% CI [1.08, 1.84]) and 4 (HR 1.46, 95% CI [1.11, 1.91]) overall, and in epoch 4 (HR 2.13, 95% CI [1.17, 3.87]) among those <60 years. Stroke incidence declined by 16% per decade in men (HR 0.84, 95% CI [0.79, 0.89]) and 19% per decade in women (HR 0.81, 95% CI [0.76, 0.86]). Among those <60 years, stroke incidence declined by 22% per decade in women (HR 0.78, 95% CI [0.67, 0.95]). Hypertension declined by 8% per decade in women only ([OR] 0.92, 95% CI [0.90, 0.94]), while Atrial fibrillation and diabetes increased in both. Conclusion: Stroke incidence continues to decline in recent periods for women and men. Among participants <60 years, decline was observed only in women, possibly related to decline in hypertension in women.

Abstract Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of bridging intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) plus endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) versus direct EVT in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) treated within the 6- to 24-hour time window. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of prospective EVT registry from 10 comprehensive stroke centers in China and Singapore between 2019 and 2024. Eligible patients had anterior circulation LVO, underwent EVT within 6-24 hours of onset, had ASPECTS 6, NIHSS 6, and pre-stroke mRS 2. Patients were stratified into bridging IVT + EVT (IVT group) versus direct EVT alone (non-IVT group). Propensity score matching (1:2 ratio) was performed to balance baseline covariates. The primary outcome was 3-month favorable functional outcome (mRS 0-2). Secondary outcomes included successful recanalization (mTICI 2b-3), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), hemorrhagic transformation (HT) and 3-month mortality. In the matched cohort, binary outcomes were compared using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. Results: Of 772 included patients, 110 (14.2%) received bridging IVT and 662 (85.8%) received direct EVT. After propensity score matching, 202 non-IVT patients were matched to 101 IVT patients, with all covariates well-balanced (absolute SMD <0.10). In the matched cohort, bridging IVT was not associated with a significant difference in 3-month favorable outcome (44.55% vs. 47.03%; common OR 0.91; 95% CI 0.56-1.46), successful recanalization (91.09% vs. 90.10%; OR 1.11; 0.51-2.44), sICH (5.94% vs. 9.41%; OR 0.61; 0.24-1.58), HT (23.76% vs. 23.27%; OR 1.03; 0.57-1.85), or 3-month mortality (15.84% vs. 13.37%; OR 1.22; 0.62-2.37). Conclusion: In this large multicenter propensity score-matched analysis, bridging intravenous thrombolysis before endovascular thrombectomy in the 6- to 24-hour time window was not significantly associated with improved efficacy or increased safety risks compared with direct endovascular therapy alone.

Abstract Background: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) remains a significant cause of disability worldwide. Current treatments, primarily intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), are limited by narrow time windows and reperfusion injury, leading to suboptimal outcomes for many patients. Chuanzhi Tongluo (CZTL), a traditional Chinese medicine, has been preliminarily recognized as a novel cerebral protection agent in animal models. Objectives: This trial investigates the efficacy and safety of CZTL capsule in patients with AIS who are not eligible for IVT or who experience early neurological deterioration after IVT. Methods and design: The CONCERN trial is an investigator-initiated, prospective, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-control, randomized clinical study in China. An estimated 1,208 eligible participants will be consecutively randomized to receive CZTL capsule therapy or placebo in 1:1 ratio across approximately 70 stroke centers in China. All enrolled patients are orally administered 2 capsules of CZTL or placebo 3 times a day together with antiplatelet agents for 3 months. Outcomes: The primary endpoint is an excellent functional outcome, defined as a score of 0 or 1 on the mRS at 90 days. Lead safety endpoints included 90-day mortality and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 48 hours. Conclusions: Results of CONCERN trial will determine the clinical efficacy and safety of the traditional Chinese medicine CZTL capsule in the treatment of AIS patients. Trial registry number: ChiCTR2300074147 (www.chictr.org.cn).

BackgroundGlobal cerebral anoxia is a leading cause of death and resuscitated patients often remained persistently affected by neurological deficits. While previous studies suggest that brain-heart electrophysiological interactions may predict severity and prognosis after hypoxic brain injury coma, little is known about the brain-heart dynamics at near-death. Gaining insight into these mechanisms is crucial for developing targeted interventions in critical conditions. ResultsUsing a rodent model of reversible systemic anoxia (n=29, male and female rats), we investigated whether brain-heart interactions during the asphyxia onset could predict the return of brain electrical activities after resuscitation. Electrophysiological recordings confirmed that cerebral activity declines following asphyxia, coinciding with increased heart rate variability. Notably, the strong coupling between cardiac parasympathetic activity and high-frequency brain activity in the somatosensory cortex and hippocampus serves as a key predictor of a favorable outcome. ConclusionOur study underscores the involvement of the brain-heart axis mechanisms in the physiology of dying and the potential prognostic significance of these mechanisms, paving the way for translational research into critical care, based on new characterizations of cardiac reflexes and brain-heart interactions.

Background: Prognostication after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) rarely captures long-term functional recovery, despite its importance to patients, families, and clinicians. Large trauma registries such as the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) dataset contain detailed clinical data but lack systematic follow-up, limiting their ability to study longer-term functional outcomes. Methods: We developed and externally validated a machine learning model to predict favorable six-month functional outcome (GOS MD/GR or GOSE >=5) using harmonized data from two randomized clinical trials: CRASH (training) and ROC-TBI (validation). Five candidate classifiers (random forest [RF], linear discriminant analysis, k-nearest neighbors, naive Bayes, and support vector machine) were trained using seven shared clinical predictors. Models were evaluated using ROC-AUC, calibration metrics, and performance at the Youden optimal threshold and a high-sensitivity secondary threshold. The final model was applied to patients with moderate-to-severe TBI in the national TQIP registry (2017-2022) to estimate population-level recovery patterns. Results: The RF model demonstrated the highest overall performance after recalibration, achieving strong discrimination (AUC internal and external, 0.887 and 0.784), good calibration, and high sensitivity (0.890) and negative predictive value (0.909). Applied to 63,289 patients from TQIP, the model estimated that 45% would achieve favorable six-month outcomes at the Youden optimal threshold and 57% at the high-sensitivity threshold, with predicted recovery aligning with established clinical correlates such as younger age, higher admission GCS, and lower rates of penetrating or brainstem injuries. Conclusion: A machine learning model trained on high-quality trial data can generate clinically plausible estimates of long-term functional recovery when applied at scale to national trauma registries that lack systematic follow-up. This approach enables imputation of functional outcomes in datasets lacking follow-up, supports benchmarking and quality improvement across trauma systems, and provides a foundation for future models incorporating physiologic time-series, imaging, and biomarker data.

Introduction Despite the proven benefits of reperfusion therapies in acute ischemic stroke, treatment decisions in the hyperacute phase remain complex and are rarely supported by individualized outcome predictions. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based clinical decision support systems (CDSS) offer potential real-time prognostic estimates, but prospective evidence of their feasibility and performance in routine clinical workflows is limited. Our aim is to prospectively evaluate real-time feasibility, usability, and predictive performance of an AI-based CDSS (VALIDATE-CDSS) for individualized outcome prediction in acute stroke care. Methods and analysis Prospective, multicenter, observational study enrolling consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke presenting to three tertiary stroke centers. Clinical management will follow standard practice at the discretion of treating physicians. In parallel, a dedicated researcher will collect patient data in real time and input them into the VALIDATE-CDSS using a mobile application, operating in shadow mode without influencing clinical decisions. The system will generate individualized predictions of 3-month functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale) for four treatment strategies (intravenous thrombolysis, endovascular thrombectomy, combined therapy, or no reperfusion) at three sequential time points: baseline clinical data, non-contrast CT, and CT angiography. The primary outcome is the real-world feasibility and usability of the VALIDATE-CDSS in the hyperacute stroke workflow. Secondary outcomes include predictive performance, agreement between model-suggested and actual treatments, incremental value with increasing data availability, and assessment of potential bias across predefined subgroups. This study will provide prospective real-world evidence on the implementation and clinical potential of AI-based decision support for personalized treatment selection in acute ischemic stroke Ethics and dissemination Patient enrollment began after approval from the ethics committees of all participating centers. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed open-access journals and conference presentations. Following open science principles, anonymized data and metadata will be made publicly available in the Zenodo repository upon study completion. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05622539).

BackgroundAcute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) causes devastating strokes. Despite the benefit of endovascular treatment, the optimal management remains sometimes controversial, such as for patients with mild deficits, and would benefit from robust prognostic tools. Given the dense white matter networks within the posterior fossa, we tested whether quantifying disconnections from acute diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) could improve outcome prediction and responders to recanalization compared with conventional metrics. MethodsWe conducted a secondary analysis from a prospective multicenter stroke registry, including consecutive patients (2017-2024) with BAO and admission MRI. Ultra-high-resolution diffusion MRI was acquired in healthy participants to build normative tractograms with optimized posterior fossa quality. Patient infarcts delineated on DWI were projected onto these tractograms to estimate disconnected fiber volume. The primary outcome was 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-3 vs 4-6. Predictive performance of disconnected fiber volume was compared with baseline NIHSS, infarct volume, and posterior circulation ASPECTS (pc-ASPECTS) using logistic regressions and areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC). Ordinal regressions tested associations across the full mRS spectrum, stratified by recanalization status. Analyses were repeated in patients with NIHSS [&le;]10. ResultsAmong 201 patients (median age 70; NIHSS 10), 97 (48.3%) had poor outcome. Despite small median infarct volume (4.75 mL), disconnected fiber volume was substantial (median 25.15 mL). Disconnected fiber volume achieved an AUC of 0.84, outperforming NIHSS (0.67; p<0.0001), infarct volume (0.75; p=0.00059), and pc-ASPECTS (0.76; p=0.0127). Low disconnected fiber volume predicted better outcomes across the full mRS (OR=0.12 [95% CI, 0.065-0.204]) and greater benefit from successful recanalization (OR=0.33 [95% CI, 0.15-0.70]). In patients with NIHSS [&le;]10 (n=102), disconnected fiber volume remained the strongest predictor (AUC=0.83). ConclusionsDisconnected fiber volume derived indirectly is a robust prognostic marker of BAO outcomes that outperforms conventional predictors and may support future treatment decisions. Registrationhttps://clinicaltrials.gov - NCT03776877.

This research demonstrates that the trans-aqueduct approach is a feasible, minimally invasive access pathway to the third ventricle, offering a potential route to the deep brain for therapeutic technologies. Further pre-clinical investigation is required to thoroughly evaluate physiological tolerance, trauma risk, and the long-term implications of intraventricular implantation. The third ventricle is a high-value site for neuromodulation due to its proximity to deep-brain targets, including the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus internus (GPi). This study defined the anatomical pathway; and evaluated the technical feasibility of retrograde access to the third ventricle via the cerebral aqueduct using minimally invasive interventional techniques. Evaluation was conducted in three phases using human MRI datasets (n=16; mean age 48.4 years) and cadaveric specimens (n=6; mean age 88.2 years). Phase 1 involved morphometric MRI analysis of the aqueduct and ventricles. Phase 2 tested trans-aqueduct access on cadaver specimens via fluoroscopically guided guidewires and catheters. Phase 3 utilized direct anatomical dissections on cadaver specimens (n=3) to morphometrically measure the third ventricular cavity and its relationship to deep-brain nuclei. Measurements across the sample groups showed a mean aqueduct diameter of 1.6 mm (SD=0.14). Third ventricle dimensions averaged 27.6 mm (ventral-dorsal), 19.9 mm (caudal-cranial), and 5.7 mm (lateral). Successful access to the third ventricle was achieved in 83% (5/6) of cadaveric specimens. The optimal technical configuration utilized a 0.018'' angled-tip guidewire and 5-6 Fr catheters; the aqueduct accommodated diameters up to 2.0 mm with minimal resistance. The STN and GPi were localized within 5-20 mm of the ventricular volumetric centroid. The trans-aqueduct approach is a technically feasible, minimally invasive pathway for accessing the third ventricle. This route offers a potential alternative for the delivery of therapeutic neurotechnologies. Further research is required to assess physiological tolerance, trauma risk, and the long-term safety of intraventricular implantation.

BackgroundHypertension is the leading modifiable risk factor for ischemic stroke, yet the adequacy of preventative hypertension care in routine clinical practice remains suboptimal. Whether gaps in hypertension management represent missed opportunities for stroke prevention remains unclear. ObjectiveTo evaluate the association between hypertension care delivery and the risk of incident ischemic stroke. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective, matched, nested case-control study among adults with hypertension using electronic health record data from a large regional health system (2010-2024). Patients with a first-ever ischemic stroke were matched 1:2 to controls on age, sex, race and ethnicity, and calendar time. Three care metrics were assessed during follow-up: (1) outpatient visits with blood pressure (BP) measurement per year; (2) number of antihypertensive medication ingredients; and (3) medication intensification score. Conditional logistic regression estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs). ResultsThe study included 13,476 cases and 26,952 matched controls (N = 40,428). Mean (SD) age was 64.8 (12.2) years, 54.1% were female, and mean follow-up was 2,497 (1,308) days. Cases had fewer BP visits per year (median, 2.50 vs. 3.01; p < 0.001), similar number of medication ingredients (2.00 vs 2.00), and lower treatment intensification scores (-0.211 vs - 0.125). In adjusted models, >5 BP visits per year was associated with lower stroke odds (aOR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.51-0.59) compared with [&le;]1 visit. Use of 2-3 medication ingredients (vs 0) was also associated with reduced stroke odds (aOR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.75-0.86), whereas >3 ingredients was not significant. The highest quartile of treatment intensification showed the strongest association (aOR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.44-0.51). Findings were consistent across subgroup and sensitivity analyses, including strata defined by baseline SBP and follow-up SBP. ConclusionsGreater engagement in hypertension care was associated with lower odds of ischemic stroke, suggesting that gaps in routine management may represent missed opportunities for prevention.

Importance: Physicians routinely prognosticate to guide care delivery and shared decision making, particularly when caring for patients with critical illnesses. Yet, these physician estimates are prone to inaccuracy and uncertainty. Artificial intelligence, including large language models (LLMs), show promise in supporting or improving this prognostication. However, the performance of contemporary LLMs in prognosticating for the heterogeneous population of critically ill patients remains poorly understood. Objective: To characterize and compare the performance of LLMs and physicians when predicting 6-month mortality for hospitalized adults who survived critical illness. Design: Embedded mixed methods study with elicitation and comparison of prognostic estimates and reasoning from LLMs and practicing physicians. Setting: The publicly available, deidentified Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV v2.2 dataset. Participants: We randomly selected 100 hospitalizations of adult survivors of critical illness. Four contemporary LLMs (Open AI GPT-4o, o3- and o4-mini, and DeepSeek-R1) and 7 physicians provided independent prognostic estimates for each case (1,100 total estimates; 400 LLM and 700 physician). Main outcomes and measures: For each case, LLMs and physicians used the hospital discharge summary and demographics to predict 6-month mortality (yes/no) and provide their reasoning (free text). We assessed prognostic performance using accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, and used inductive, qualitative content analysis to characterize reasonings. Results: Mean physician accuracy for predicting mortality was 70.1% (95% CI 63.7-76.4%), with sensitivity of 59.7% (95% CI 50.6-68.8%) and specificity of 80.6% (95% CI 71.7-88.2%). The top-performing LLM (OpenAI o4-mini) accuracy was 78.0% (95% CI 70.0-86.0%), with sensitivity of 80.0% (95% CI 67.4-90.2%) and specificity of 76.0% (95% CI 63.3-88.0%). The difference between mean physician and top-performing LLM accuracy was not statistically significant (p = 0.5). Qualitative analysis revealed similar patterns in LLM and physician expressed reasoning, except that physicians regularly and explicitly reported uncertainty while LLMs did not. Conclusion and Relevance: In this study, LLMs and physicians achieved comparable, moderate performance in predicting 6-month mortality after critical illness, with similar patterns in expressed reasoning. Our findings suggest LLMs could be used to support prognostication in clinical practice but also raise safety concerns due to the lack of LLM uncertainty expression.

Introduction: Accurate stratification of hard atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk remains challenging despite advances in prevention. Liver function biomarkers (LFBs), particularly gamma - glutamyl transferase (GGT), have been linked to cardiovascular outcomes, yet their contribution to hard ASCVD risk prediction is not well defined. Methods: This study analyzed data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 2005 - 2018) to assess cross - sectional associations between LFBs and 10 - year hard ASCVD risk estimated by the ACC/AHA Pooled Cohort Equations. Multivariable regression, restricted cubic splines, and mediation analyses were applied to examine independent and dose - response relationships. External validation was performed in the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) and NHANES using machine learning models (CoxBoost, Naive Bayes and Random Forest). Results: Among 5,731 NHANES participants, GGT showed an independent linear association with hard ASCVD risk (P - trend = 0.003), partly mediated by systolic blood pressure (44.8%), HbA1c (19.0%), and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (13.4%). Machine learning (ML) models incorporating GGT, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and globulin alongside traditional risk factors improved predictive accuracy, with Naive Bayes achieving an AUC of 0.751 in NHANES validation. Conclusions: GGT is an independent and biologically plausible biomarker of hard ASCVD risk, acting through cardiometabolic pathways. Incorporating LFBs into risk prediction models, particularly with machine learning, enhances risk stratification and may facilitate early identification of high - risk individuals.

BackgroundTheory of Mind (ToM) deficits are well-documented in right-hemisphere stroke but remain understudied in post-stroke aphasia. Prior work suggests that performance on tasks assessing ToM may be relatively preserved in aphasia and dissociable from language impairment, but these findings are based largely on small studies. This study examined performance on nonverbal false-belief tasks in post-stroke aphasia, its relationship with aphasia severity, and whether vascular brain health, operationalized using cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) markers, contributed to variability in performance. MethodsForty-four individuals with aphasia completed two nonverbal belief-reasoning tasks assessing spontaneous perspective-taking and self-perspective inhibition. Task accuracy served as the primary outcome. Linear regression models examined associations between task performance, aphasia severity (Western Aphasia Battery-Revised Aphasia Quotient), and CSVD markers, including white matter hyperintensities, cerebral microbleeds, lacunes and enlarged perivascular spaces in the basal ganglia and centrum semiovale. ResultsPerformance was heterogeneous across tasks, with reduced performance observed in 23% of participants on the Reality-Unknown task and 36% on the Reality-Known task. Aphasia severity was not associated with task accuracy. Greater cerebral microbleed count was associated with lower accuracy on both tasks, while greater basal ganglia enlarged perivascular spaces burden showed a more selective association with lower performance. ConclusionsPerformance on nonverbal false-belief tasks in aphasia is variable and not explained by aphasia severity alone. These findings suggest that apparent ToM-related difficulties in aphasia may be shaped by broader vascular brain health, supporting a more multidimensional framework for interpreting social-cognitive task performance after stroke.

BackgroundAlthough neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (nOH) is a common and debilitating feature of multiple system atrophy (MSA), little is known about the burden of symptoms in the real world. ObjectivesTo design and conduct a cross-sectional community-based research survey targeting patients with MSA, with and without nOH. MethodsWe recruited patients with MSA to complete an anonymous online survey covering three core themes: 1) timely diagnosis, 2) nOH pharmacotherapy and refractory symptoms, and 3) confidence in physician knowledge. Responses were grouped by pre-specified diagnostic certainty levels. Relationships between symptoms, function, and pharmacotherapy were assessed using univariate and multivariate methods. ResultsWe analyzed 259 respondents with a self-reported diagnosis of MSA (age: M=64.38, SD=8.09 years; 44% female). In total, 42% also had a diagnosis nOH; 40% had symptoms highly suspicious of nOH, but no diagnosis; and 21% reported having never had their blood pressure measured in the standing position at a clinical visit. Treatment with a pressor agent was independently associated with the presence of other symptoms of autonomic failure. Each additional nOH symptom reported increased the odds of requiring pharmacotherapy by 18%. Yet, despite anti-hypotensive medication use, 97% of patients reported limitations in their ability to bathe, cook, or arise from a chair/bed with 76% needing caregiver support for refractory nOH symptoms. ConclusionsThis cross-sectional representative sample shows nOH is underrecognized and undertreated in MSA patients, leading to substantial functional limitations. It is our hope that these findings are leveraged for planning future trials and advocating for better treatments.

Background: Even for experienced operators, endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms involves intraoperative uncertainty that may lead to adjustments in strategy, prolong the procedure, and potentially cause inefficiency and device waste. This study aimed to evaluate whether pre-procedural testing (PPT) of endovascular treatment using patient-specific models was associated with increased operator confidence and perceived clinical utility, including improvements in procedural efficiency and reduced resource waste. Methods: We enrolled a cohort of patients who underwent PPT before endovascular treatment for complex unruptured intracranial aneurysms and compared their outcomes with a control group treated without PPT. The primary outcome was the Training Fidelity Score, a composite of three operator-reported Likert items defined a priori. Secondary outcomes included perceived clinical utility, intraoperative strategy changes, procedural time, radiation exposure, device waste and safety. Results: A total of 85 patients met the inclusion criteria (PPT=40; control=45). The Training Fidelity Score was high across the PPT group (median, 4.33/5). Perceived clinical utility was high and further increased significantly after the procedure. A significant reduction was observed in intraoperative strategy changes, with no changes recorded in the PPT group, compared to 6/45 in the control group (RR 0.09; p=0.027). Reductions in treatment time, radiation exposure and device waste were also noted. Conclusion: PPT using patient-specific models was associated with increased operator confidence, fewer intraoperative strategy changes, improved procedural efficiency, and reduced device waste without compromising safety. These findings support its use in pre-interventional preparation, but require prospective multicenter validation.

Objectives: Academic medical institutions are the gatekeepers of the physician workforce and shape the future of medicine by regulating medical school admissions as well as residency training. Although broadly the field of medicine is seeing more representation from traditionally underrepresented groups, the critical decision-making platform of academic medicine continues to be uncharacteristically homogeneous, represented mainly by white males. This is even more pronounced in surgical subspecialties, such as academic neurosurgery. This study aims to quantify this phenomenon, uncover its driving factors, and define opportunities for improvement. Methods: Using a mixed research methodology, academic neurosurgical faculty in the U.S were identified, and their demographic data was collected. An internet search using Google Scholar and Scopus was conducted to determine scholarly activity using number of publications and h-index. Results: We found a significant increase in female faculty in academic neurosurgery within the last decade. Comparing the faculty rank amongst male and female faculty, we found that the majority of female faculty are at the assistant professor level (n=36/79; 45.6%) while male faculty are more at the full professor rank (n=265/582; 45.5%). A similar trend was seen for under-represented minority neurosurgery faculty. Strong scholarly activity corelated with a departmental chair position for male faculty, however, this trend was not true for female faculty. There was a significant difference in the number of publications and h-index in female vs male faculty, but only when including male faculty outliers at the full professor level. Conclusion: Slowly but steadily, academic neurosurgery is making progress towards a more diverse and representative workforce in the U.S that better reflects the patient population. Facilitating timely progression of females and URM neurosurgeons into senior professorship and academic leadership roles will further advance this essential progress.

Post-stroke cognitive recovery is difficult to predict using focal lesion characteristics alone. The brain's capacity to maintain cognitive function depends also on structural integrity of the whole brain. One way to measure brain health is through the severity of cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) markers, which reflect aging-related pathologies that erode structural integrity. Here, we propose a composite measure of CSVD (cCSVD) integrating three independently validated biomarkers automatically quantified using T1-weighted MRIs: white matter hyperintensity volume (WMH; representing vascular injury), perivascular space count (PVS; putative glymphatic clearance), and brain-predicted age difference (brain-PAD; structural atrophy). We hypothesize that cCSVD, which captures the shared variance across these CSVD biomarkers, will be a robust indicator of whole-brain structural integrity and predict cognitive changes 3 months after stroke. We analyzed 65 early subacute stroke survivors with assessments within 21 days (baseline) and at 90 days (follow-up) post-stroke. WMH volume, PVS count, and brain-PAD were quantified from baseline T1-weighted MRIs, and then residualized for age, sex, days since stroke, and intracranial volume. Principal component analysis (PCA) of the residualized biomarkers was used to derive cCSVD. Beta regression with stability selection using LASSO was used to model three outcomes: baseline Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores, follow-up MoCA scores, and longitudinal change (follow-up score adjusted for baseline score). Logistic regression was used to test if baseline cCSVD predicted improvement in those with baseline cognitive impairment (MoCA < 26). The PCA revealed that the first principal component (PC1) explained 43.1% of the total variance among WMH volume, PVS count, and brain-PAD. The three biomarkers contributed nearly equally to PC1, which was subsequently used as the baseline cCSVD score. Lower baseline cCSVD was significantly associated with better MoCA scores at follow-up ({beta} = -0.19, p = 0.009), even after adjusting for baseline MoCA ({beta} = -0.12, p = 0.042), and, importantly, outperformed all individual biomarkers. Furthermore, lower cCSVD at baseline significantly increased the likelihood of improving to cognitively unimpaired status at three months (OR = 0.34, p = 0.036), independent of age and education. The composite CSVD captures the additive impact of vascular injury, glymphatic dysfunction, and structural atrophy on recovery in a way that individual measures do not. cCSVD accounts for shared variance across these domains, reflecting a patient's latent capacity for cognitive recovery, where relative integrity in one CSVD domain may mitigate effects of another. This automated, T1-based framework offers a scalable tool for predicting post-stroke recovery.

Background: Few studies have examined racioethnic disparities in cardiovascular disease (CVD) in women after breast cancer treatment, who are at higher risk due to cardiotoxic cancer treatment. Methods: Based on the Pathways Heart Study of women with a history of breast cancer, this analysis examines the association between cardiometabolic risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia) and CVD events with self-reported race and ethnicity, as well as genetic similarity. Multivariable logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to test race and ethnicity and genetic similarity with prevalent and incident cardiometabolic risk factors and CVD events. Results: Of the 4,071 patients in this analysis, non-Hispanic Black (NHB), Asian, and Hispanic women were more likely to have prevalent and incident diabetes than non-Hispanic White (NHW) women. Analysis of genetic similarity revealed results consistent with self-reported race and ethnicity. For CVD risk, NHB women were more likely to develop heart failure and cardiomyopathy than NHW women. In contrast, Hispanic women were at lower risk of any incident CVD, serious CVD, arrhythmia, heart failure or cardiomyopathy, and ischemic heart disease, which was consistent with the associations found with Native American ancestry. Conclusions: This is the largest multi-ethnic study of disparities in CVD health in breast cancer survivors, demonstrating corroborating findings between self-reported race and ethnicity and genetic similarity. The results highlight disparities in cardiometabolic risk factors and CVD among breast cancer survivors that warrant more research and clinical attention in these distinct, high-risk populations.

Introduction: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is frequently accompanied by persistent symptoms of unknown pathogenesis after the index event. Autonomic dysfunction is a plausible mechanism for these but has not been systematically characterized. We quantified antecedent and contemporary autonomic symptoms in survivors of SCAD and examined their associations with cardiac and extra-cardiac symptoms and health-related quality of life. Methods: This cross-sectional study recruited 227 volunteers from multiple countries with a self-reported history of SCAD. Participants completed validated patient-reported measures, including the Composite Autonomic Symptom Score-31 (COMPASS-31), Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3 (ASI-3), and EuroQol-5 Dimension-5L (EQ-5D-5L). They also completed an internally derived retrospective autonomic predisposition score assessing symptoms during adolescence and early adulthood. Results: Participants were predominantly female (97.8%), median age 53 (47-58) years, and were surveyed a median of 3 (1-5) years after their index SCAD event. 21.6% reported SCAD recurrence. Moderate autonomic symptom burden (COMPASS-31 20) was present in 56.4% and severe burden (40) in 16.3%. History of antecedent autonomic symptoms was the strongest independent predictor of contemporary autonomic symptom burden after adjustment for demographic and clinical covariates (=0.514; P <0.001). Greater autonomic symptom burden independently predicted lower EQ-5D health utility (=0.150; P=0.029) and was associated with the ASI-3 physical concerns (=0.232; P <0.001), but not social concerns domain. Autonomic symptoms were not associated with SCAD recurrence. Conclusion: Symptoms of autonomic dysregulation are common in survivors of SCAD and are associated with reduced quality of life. Their association with antecedent dysautonomic features during adolescence and early adulthood suggests a longstanding predisposition, the significance of which warrants further evaluation.

PurposeObstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common comorbidity in heart failure (HF) patients with prevalence increasing as HF severity worsens. While CPAP/BiPAP has been shown to reduce disease burden and mortality in the general HF population, it is unclear whether these benefits extend to patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). We sought to determine whether OSA affects long-term survival in newly implanted LVAD patients and whether CPAP/BiPAP treatment confers mortality benefits. MethodsThis single-center retrospective study included patients who underwent LVAD implantation between January 2007 and February 2022. Recipients were stratified by OSA status (OSA vs No-OSA), and those with OSA were further categorized based on CPAP/BiPAP compliance. Comparative statistics and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed, with log-rank tests used to compare groups and assess survival differences. A Cox proportional hazards model was conducted to evaluate the association between risk factors and survival among patients with OSA and No-OSA. ResultsBefore LVAD implantation, patients with OSA had higher body mass index, hypertension, and a higher rate of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement than those without OSA. OSA was not associated with increased postoperative complications. Although survival did not differ significantly between OSA and No-OSA patients (p=0.33), CPAP/BiPAP-compliant OSA patients had significantly better survival than noncompliant patients (p=0.0099). ConclusionsLVAD patients with OSA who consistently use CPAP/BiPAP have better survival than those who do not. CPAP/BiPAP is a simple, low-risk treatment that can reduce mortality in this population. Therefore, increased perioperative screening for OSA should be considered for patients receiving LVADs. Multicenter studies are needed to confirm our findings further.